Discussion:
Android app on W/7?
(too old to reply)
g***@aol.com
2024-08-07 06:33:58 UTC
Permalink
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
VanguardLH
2024-08-07 08:13:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
The Android SDK has an emulator.
https://developer.android.com/studio

Bluestacks is an Android emulator.
https://www.bluestacks.com/

Lots of online articles on Android emulators, like:
https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-emulators-for-pc-655308/

You can use a VMM (Virtual Machine Manager; e.g., Virtualbox) to run an
Android OS inside a VM (Virtual Machine). You get an image of an
Android OS to put inside a VM.
https://www.linuxvmimages.com/images/android-x86/
https://www.osboxes.org/android-x86/
https://www.android-x86.org/documentation/virtualbox.html

I didn't bother to determine which emulators support Windows 7. You may
have to get an old version of an emulator to use on an old OS.

Sorry, no idea what "TVs" you have to know if their deployment of
Windows 7 is a full OS, or some embedded OS with partial abilities. The
above are suggestions on how to get an Android emulator running on a
Windows 7 workstation, not some TV running some customized or limited
version of Windows 7.
g***@aol.com
2024-08-07 17:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
The Android SDK has an emulator.
https://developer.android.com/studio
Bluestacks is an Android emulator.
https://www.bluestacks.com/
https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-emulators-for-pc-655308/
You can use a VMM (Virtual Machine Manager; e.g., Virtualbox) to run an
Android OS inside a VM (Virtual Machine). You get an image of an
Android OS to put inside a VM.
https://www.linuxvmimages.com/images/android-x86/
https://www.osboxes.org/android-x86/
https://www.android-x86.org/documentation/virtualbox.html
I didn't bother to determine which emulators support Windows 7. You may
have to get an old version of an emulator to use on an old OS.
Sorry, no idea what "TVs" you have to know if their deployment of
Windows 7 is a full OS, or some embedded OS with partial abilities. The
above are suggestions on how to get an Android emulator running on a
Windows 7 workstation, not some TV running some customized or limited
version of Windows 7.
My TVs run on thin client PCs. It is not in the TV. I am running a mix
of 7 home and 7 pro.
Blue Stacks seems to come up in these conversations. I guess I will
have to dig into that ... or just find a different DVR solution..
The Channels thing looks attractive but it uses off the shelf hardware
(Homerun tuner) so there may be other options. The guide seems to be
the main hook. I am just surprised the client software does not have a
PC option. It is all aimed at mobile devices. (Apple or Android)
They did suggest a W/11 machine but it seems MS is dropping Android
support on that.
VanguardLH
2024-08-07 19:53:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@aol.com
Post by VanguardLH
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
The Android SDK has an emulator.
https://developer.android.com/studio
Bluestacks is an Android emulator.
https://www.bluestacks.com/
https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-emulators-for-pc-655308/
You can use a VMM (Virtual Machine Manager; e.g., Virtualbox) to run an
Android OS inside a VM (Virtual Machine). You get an image of an
Android OS to put inside a VM.
https://www.linuxvmimages.com/images/android-x86/
https://www.osboxes.org/android-x86/
https://www.android-x86.org/documentation/virtualbox.html
I didn't bother to determine which emulators support Windows 7. You may
have to get an old version of an emulator to use on an old OS.
Sorry, no idea what "TVs" you have to know if their deployment of
Windows 7 is a full OS, or some embedded OS with partial abilities. The
above are suggestions on how to get an Android emulator running on a
Windows 7 workstation, not some TV running some customized or limited
version of Windows 7.
My TVs run on thin client PCs. It is not in the TV. I am running a mix
of 7 home and 7 pro.
So, your TVs are actually less-than-stellar monitors as part of a
computing platform.
Post by g***@aol.com
Blue Stacks seems to come up in these conversations. I guess I will
have to dig into that ... or just find a different DVR solution..
The Channels thing looks attractive but it uses off the shelf hardware
(Homerun tuner) so there may be other options. The guide seems to be
the main hook. I am just surprised the client software does not have a
PC option. It is all aimed at mobile devices. (Apple or Android)
They did suggest a W/11 machine but it seems MS is dropping Android
support on that.
I didn't mention Windows 11, because that would mean you would need to
dump Windows 7 to move to Windows 11. Didn't seem an option since you
posted in a Windows 7 newsgroup.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/android/wsa/

Windows Subsystem for Android (WSA) was introduced in Windows 11 build
22000.527 on Feb 15, 2022. Microsoft announced deprecation of WSA in
March 2024, and WSA support ends March 2025, so 3 years from birth to
death. Seems rather short for a subsystem. Don't have Windows 11, so
no experience with WSA to know if it was reasonable, doable, or
otherwise usable. Their WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) was
introduced in Windows 10 back in 2016, is still supported 8 years later,
but is, um, uninspiring. Cygwin seemed a better choice. However, I've
had no need to use partial Linux on a Windows platform. If Windows 12
is a another flop, it'll be time for me to considering dumping Windows,
and moving to Linux, like Mint or Debian. Windows NT 3.5, eh. Windows
NT 4, better. Windows XP, yes. Windows Vista, no. Windows 7, yes.
Windows 8, no. Windows 10, yes. Windows 11, no. If Microsoft follows
their pattern, Windows 12 might be a yes, but I'm not expecting a
miraculously recovery of sanity at Microsoft.

For me, I'd go the VM route: run a guest Android OS in a VM on a Windows
host. You'd be running an actual image of Android instead of hoping
some emulator is sufficiently robust to do what the Android OS does.
g***@aol.com
2024-08-09 03:00:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by g***@aol.com
Post by VanguardLH
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
The Android SDK has an emulator.
https://developer.android.com/studio
Bluestacks is an Android emulator.
https://www.bluestacks.com/
https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-emulators-for-pc-655308/
You can use a VMM (Virtual Machine Manager; e.g., Virtualbox) to run an
Android OS inside a VM (Virtual Machine). You get an image of an
Android OS to put inside a VM.
https://www.linuxvmimages.com/images/android-x86/
https://www.osboxes.org/android-x86/
https://www.android-x86.org/documentation/virtualbox.html
I didn't bother to determine which emulators support Windows 7. You may
have to get an old version of an emulator to use on an old OS.
Sorry, no idea what "TVs" you have to know if their deployment of
Windows 7 is a full OS, or some embedded OS with partial abilities. The
above are suggestions on how to get an Android emulator running on a
Windows 7 workstation, not some TV running some customized or limited
version of Windows 7.
My TVs run on thin client PCs. It is not in the TV. I am running a mix
of 7 home and 7 pro.
So, your TVs are actually less-than-stellar monitors as part of a
computing platform.
Post by g***@aol.com
Blue Stacks seems to come up in these conversations. I guess I will
have to dig into that ... or just find a different DVR solution..
The Channels thing looks attractive but it uses off the shelf hardware
(Homerun tuner) so there may be other options. The guide seems to be
the main hook. I am just surprised the client software does not have a
PC option. It is all aimed at mobile devices. (Apple or Android)
They did suggest a W/11 machine but it seems MS is dropping Android
support on that.
I didn't mention Windows 11, because that would mean you would need to
dump Windows 7 to move to Windows 11. Didn't seem an option since you
posted in a Windows 7 newsgroup.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/android/wsa/
Windows Subsystem for Android (WSA) was introduced in Windows 11 build
22000.527 on Feb 15, 2022. Microsoft announced deprecation of WSA in
March 2024, and WSA support ends March 2025, so 3 years from birth to
death. Seems rather short for a subsystem. Don't have Windows 11, so
no experience with WSA to know if it was reasonable, doable, or
otherwise usable. Their WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) was
introduced in Windows 10 back in 2016, is still supported 8 years later,
but is, um, uninspiring. Cygwin seemed a better choice. However, I've
had no need to use partial Linux on a Windows platform. If Windows 12
is a another flop, it'll be time for me to considering dumping Windows,
and moving to Linux, like Mint or Debian. Windows NT 3.5, eh. Windows
NT 4, better. Windows XP, yes. Windows Vista, no. Windows 7, yes.
Windows 8, no. Windows 10, yes. Windows 11, no. If Microsoft follows
their pattern, Windows 12 might be a yes, but I'm not expecting a
miraculously recovery of sanity at Microsoft.
For me, I'd go the VM route: run a guest Android OS in a VM on a Windows
host. You'd be running an actual image of Android instead of hoping
some emulator is sufficiently robust to do what the Android OS does.
All of my monitors but one are really TVs. This one here is a 32"
Visio, It is not a great monitor but it is big (1360x768) and I sit
far away.
The 75" 4k Samsung is across from me is a pretty good monitor tho.
Back in the shop I have a 46" on end for reading PDFs and such.

I canceled my subscription at Channels today. It is just not going to
work for me. Thanks for your help.
I do have 2 W/11 laptops here I paid $40 each for but I don't use them
much. One hasn't been on since I got it loaded.
They were both W/10 machines but one didn't have a password and it was
easier just to reload it with 11 that try to hack into it.
I am not sure why I put 11 on the other one except I just wanted a
clean start. Probably should have stuck with 10. (or 7 if I could
find drivers)
Paul
2024-08-07 23:16:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
It looks like the purpose of the clients, is to be traceable
to a phone number or other identifier. Otherwise, I can't imagine
why the selection is so meager. Their intention seems to be, that
an individual would watch TV at Starbucks, with the packets
served by their home router and NAS. And presumably, they are
going to solve the DynDNS problem using authentication from the phone,
so you attempt to connect to the right household :-) The server logs
into the Channels server, and the Channels server notes the server
is at 11.22.33.44 and makes a note of the account. If an Android phone
claims to be Mr.Fretwell, they give the Android phone the 11.22.33.44 value.

Clients:

"Channels for Android

Running on your phone, tablet, or Android TV device, Channels is the best way to watch your shows."

"Channels for iOS" [Could be a phone and an iPad?]

"Channels for Apple TV"

"Channels for Fire TV"

It is $8 per month, and you get Guide Data.

*******

There are USB and PCI Express tuner devices. The HDHomeRun is merely
a network oriented tuner, that emits packets on Ethernet. This avoids
some amount of driver issues I suppose. But otherwise is weak sauce.
I have nothing against them, except they seem to have stopped making the Prime,
and they're not very honest about it.

https://getchannels.com/docs/getting-started/quick-start-guide/what-is-an-hdhomerun/

"Quick Advice

Antenna - HDHomeRun Connect Quatro <=== ATSC over the air reception. Many ways to do this.
Cable - HDHomeRun Prime <=== is that still available ?

There are likely other ways to do a DVR than that. The Prime model
took a Cable Card (you rent those from the cable company for $5 a month).
This allowed the Prime model to record off cable TV. The Cable Card is for decryption.
They did not destroy the evidence. There is still an entry, but you can't
get there from the front of the site.

https://shop.silicondust.com/shop/product/hdhr3-cc/ # You can look, but can't buy this.
# While it pretends to be out-of-stock,
# I think it is gone for good (long long ago).

The other HDHomeRun are just OTA 8VSB ATSC recorders.

Modern Cable TV is encrypted, to reduce or eliminate theft. Encrypted QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation).

Sure, you can record OTA 8VSB ATSC if you want, but the channel lineup varies
from, say, 50 channels in urban settings, to 1 or 0 channels in rural settings.
New Brunswick, Canada is a "desert" for TV, and it is cable or hit the road Jack.
From a square mileage perspective, much of the country is 1 channel on a good day.
It used to be almost guaranteed you could get the one channel, back in analog days.
The guarantee was removed when digital TV showed up. Thus: desert.

*******

I just have a Hauppauge card in my PC. I have Media Center as a recorder.
I have Hauppauge WinTV as a recorder. The Media Center relied on Guide Data,
that if I were to check right now, there would be no Guide Data.

The channel has encoded, some "what is next" guide data. It would tell you
Gilligans Island was next. If you had a PVR or DVR, I suppose it could start
recording. But real planning uses full Guide Data. Some TV systems, have a full Guide Data
mechanism. But I don't know if that is universal, is carried on a specific channel,
or how that is done. The standards may only cover the "thin" "What is next"
kind of data.

Real TV fanatics, use a multitude of tuners. That's why the various
companies are selling quads.

https://hauppauge.com/pages/products/compare_tuners.html

*******

This is the one I got. I don't consider the NXP 7164 to be all that important,
as it's an encoder from analog NTSC to MPEG2 (for recording). That gives
you a zero CPU overhead when analog recording. But we're solidly in the digital era
now. And the digital chipset (with forward error correction) is the nice part of
this one. This thing can dig into noise and with FEC, I can still have a solid picture
on this, when the STB has walked over the waterfall and gone "black-screen". So the
pixelated blocks are gone, sync is gone, and it is black screen. The waterfall is
only 2dB deep or so. Having the FEC, is like having a Yagi antenna that is a foot longer.

https://hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_hvr2255.html

The problem with chipsets, is they keep going out of production.
The need gets filled with something else. But only when you
receive the product (and do the comparison test as I did),
do you see whether the product is good or not. For example,
the STB I bought, had received rave reviews, but in the end,
it turned out to be a bit of a turkey. The DSP wasn't exactly top
notch, but the ability to letterbox or adjust screen dimensions
were pretty good. There weren't a lot of short squat people on
the screen, or unnecessarily thin tall people on the screen, because
the dimensions were properly handled. But in terms of reception, it
might have been missing FEC (I'm just going from memory here, it's a long
time since I've even looked at tuners, let alone use one).

Having an antenna for your tuner is nice. It took me a month to build this.
It started out a 2D antenna, ended up a 3D antenna, so I had to modify the
design on the fly. If you remove VHF capability, items like this can
be a lot more petite. A lot of the "junk in the back" is for VHF.
The zig-zag thing is UHF. A USENET contributor, provided the dimensions
(it's an existing design, that a software developer wrote an optimizer
and picked new dimensions for the rods). AFAIK, it would use 4NEC2 over and
over again, for design evaluation.

[Picture] Gray Hoverman, VHF+UHF, 15dBi (exactly 50 feet of 1/4" copper tubing)

Loading Image...

If the gain is much higher than that, they get hard to point.
If you had a 30dBi antenna, the pole would need to be an iron giant,
the base poured concrete, to reduce the effects of wind (outdoors).
The antenna I made, is intended for livingroom or attic usage.
In the attic, you lose 6dB because of a wet roof. That's a huge
bite of gain.

I don't know what equipment or experience you've got. The
availability of gubbins for the project, is a lot thinner
than it used to be. No Radioshack any more. Can't get various
F-series at a reasonable price in town. And so on.

And Media Center is not supported any more. And thus, is
not a driver for compatibility. A manufacturer could still
use Media Center compatibility as a selling feature, but
there is no longer "pull" from Media Center users, to help
sell product.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DVR_software_packages

Paul
g***@aol.com
2024-08-09 03:18:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
It looks like the purpose of the clients, is to be traceable
to a phone number or other identifier. Otherwise, I can't imagine
why the selection is so meager. Their intention seems to be, that
an individual would watch TV at Starbucks, with the packets
served by their home router and NAS. And presumably, they are
going to solve the DynDNS problem using authentication from the phone,
so you attempt to connect to the right household :-) The server logs
into the Channels server, and the Channels server notes the server
is at 11.22.33.44 and makes a note of the account. If an Android phone
claims to be Mr.Fretwell, they give the Android phone the 11.22.33.44 value.
"Channels for Android
Running on your phone, tablet, or Android TV device, Channels is the best way to watch your shows."
"Channels for iOS" [Could be a phone and an iPad?]
"Channels for Apple TV"
"Channels for Fire TV"
It is $8 per month, and you get Guide Data.
*******
There are USB and PCI Express tuner devices. The HDHomeRun is merely
a network oriented tuner, that emits packets on Ethernet. This avoids
some amount of driver issues I suppose. But otherwise is weak sauce.
I have nothing against them, except they seem to have stopped making the Prime,
and they're not very honest about it.
https://getchannels.com/docs/getting-started/quick-start-guide/what-is-an-hdhomerun/
"Quick Advice
Antenna - HDHomeRun Connect Quatro <=== ATSC over the air reception. Many ways to do this.
Cable - HDHomeRun Prime <=== is that still available ?
There are likely other ways to do a DVR than that. The Prime model
took a Cable Card (you rent those from the cable company for $5 a month).
This allowed the Prime model to record off cable TV. The Cable Card is for decryption.
They did not destroy the evidence. There is still an entry, but you can't
get there from the front of the site.
https://shop.silicondust.com/shop/product/hdhr3-cc/ # You can look, but can't buy this.
# While it pretends to be out-of-stock,
# I think it is gone for good (long long ago).
The other HDHomeRun are just OTA 8VSB ATSC recorders.
Modern Cable TV is encrypted, to reduce or eliminate theft. Encrypted QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation).
Sure, you can record OTA 8VSB ATSC if you want, but the channel lineup varies
from, say, 50 channels in urban settings, to 1 or 0 channels in rural settings.
New Brunswick, Canada is a "desert" for TV, and it is cable or hit the road Jack.
From a square mileage perspective, much of the country is 1 channel on a good day.
It used to be almost guaranteed you could get the one channel, back in analog days.
The guarantee was removed when digital TV showed up. Thus: desert.
*******
I just have a Hauppauge card in my PC. I have Media Center as a recorder.
I have Hauppauge WinTV as a recorder. The Media Center relied on Guide Data,
that if I were to check right now, there would be no Guide Data.
The channel has encoded, some "what is next" guide data. It would tell you
Gilligans Island was next. If you had a PVR or DVR, I suppose it could start
recording. But real planning uses full Guide Data. Some TV systems, have a full Guide Data
mechanism. But I don't know if that is universal, is carried on a specific channel,
or how that is done. The standards may only cover the "thin" "What is next"
kind of data.
Real TV fanatics, use a multitude of tuners. That's why the various
companies are selling quads.
https://hauppauge.com/pages/products/compare_tuners.html
*******
This is the one I got. I don't consider the NXP 7164 to be all that important,
as it's an encoder from analog NTSC to MPEG2 (for recording). That gives
you a zero CPU overhead when analog recording. But we're solidly in the digital era
now. And the digital chipset (with forward error correction) is the nice part of
this one. This thing can dig into noise and with FEC, I can still have a solid picture
on this, when the STB has walked over the waterfall and gone "black-screen". So the
pixelated blocks are gone, sync is gone, and it is black screen. The waterfall is
only 2dB deep or so. Having the FEC, is like having a Yagi antenna that is a foot longer.
https://hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_hvr2255.html
The problem with chipsets, is they keep going out of production.
The need gets filled with something else. But only when you
receive the product (and do the comparison test as I did),
do you see whether the product is good or not. For example,
the STB I bought, had received rave reviews, but in the end,
it turned out to be a bit of a turkey. The DSP wasn't exactly top
notch, but the ability to letterbox or adjust screen dimensions
were pretty good. There weren't a lot of short squat people on
the screen, or unnecessarily thin tall people on the screen, because
the dimensions were properly handled. But in terms of reception, it
might have been missing FEC (I'm just going from memory here, it's a long
time since I've even looked at tuners, let alone use one).
Having an antenna for your tuner is nice. It took me a month to build this.
It started out a 2D antenna, ended up a 3D antenna, so I had to modify the
design on the fly. If you remove VHF capability, items like this can
be a lot more petite. A lot of the "junk in the back" is for VHF.
The zig-zag thing is UHF. A USENET contributor, provided the dimensions
(it's an existing design, that a software developer wrote an optimizer
and picked new dimensions for the rods). AFAIK, it would use 4NEC2 over and
over again, for design evaluation.
[Picture] Gray Hoverman, VHF+UHF, 15dBi (exactly 50 feet of 1/4" copper tubing)
https://i.postimg.cc/pdrx6Zkv/tv-antenna.gif
If the gain is much higher than that, they get hard to point.
If you had a 30dBi antenna, the pole would need to be an iron giant,
the base poured concrete, to reduce the effects of wind (outdoors).
The antenna I made, is intended for livingroom or attic usage.
In the attic, you lose 6dB because of a wet roof. That's a huge
bite of gain.
I don't know what equipment or experience you've got. The
availability of gubbins for the project, is a lot thinner
than it used to be. No Radioshack any more. Can't get various
F-series at a reasonable price in town. And so on.
And Media Center is not supported any more. And thus, is
not a driver for compatibility. A manufacturer could still
use Media Center compatibility as a selling feature, but
there is no longer "pull" from Media Center users, to help
sell product.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DVR_software_packages
Paul
I have a powered rooftop antenna on a 20' mast and it gets all the
stations I care about. (4 networks and a bunch of "rerun" sub
channels). I have a TiVo that works well for scheduling recordings.
The problem is Xperi seems to be trying to ditch the traditional TiVo
and license the software package to cable operators. Blue Streak uses
it for sure. (my FIL has it)
I have a couple Hauppauge cards around here but the old one is only
NTSC and the new one has the DRM locked down so tight it was useless
for anything I tried like recording off the satellite.
If I do want to record my DVD Video Converter will record anything you
can see so if I really wanted to steal something from Prime, it would
be trivial but I haven't bothered. If I want a movie I buy the CD for
$4 on Ebay.
I have decided I am just going to stick with TiVo as long as they last
and then go look for a more friendly PC solution. I am going to keep
my eye out for a network tuner cheap, just to play with..
I found out, talking to those Channels boys, I am not really a
"streamer". I only have Netflix and Prime and "eek" I don't have a
smart phone or a tablet.
Paul
2024-08-09 07:37:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@aol.com
I found out, talking to those Channels boys, I am not really a
"streamer". I only have Netflix and Prime and "eek" I don't have a
smart phone or a tablet.
Just found this -- to give some idea what guide data should be.
They were using Schedules Direct for $25/yr. The Channels thing
is a bit more maybe.

For a Canadian user of Media Center, it used to be, you went to
a certain private site, for some script or so, something to repair
what Microsoft had offered Canadians. Otherwise, Media Center could
not get digital TV working (analog might have worked but we don't
have any analog here, except in remote locations with five watt
transmitters and stuff). The Windows 7 on the other machine, may still
have the necessary materials.

https://www.thegreenbutton.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12700

It just always seems to be a "feeding off the land" kind
of experience, this TV recording thing.

I don't know why, but I just have this itch to buy enough
quads to record all the available channels, on a continuous basis :-)
And screw the Guide Data.

On Linux, you can use VLC to watch TV from a tuner. You
can use something like "w_scan" to do a channel scan and see
what your tuner can see. The tuner card needs "firmware", and
again, for my card, a private site run by some guy, has
extracted the firmware from the Windows driver, and you put
that in /fw or so, in the tree, so the boot process can find it.
Then the tuner magically works, when you wscan. That's how I got
the first images from my newest tuner card, as it took ten days
for my copy of WinTV to show up in the snail mail. But by then,
at least I knew the card worked, so the "need to return the product"
had passed.

And using the w_scan results, you have some idea what other recorder
packages should be seeing for channels.

Only a couple versions of Windows 7 don't have Media Center.
And you are unlikely to be using them (they're awful).

Paul
g***@aol.com
2024-08-10 06:07:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by g***@aol.com
I found out, talking to those Channels boys, I am not really a
"streamer". I only have Netflix and Prime and "eek" I don't have a
smart phone or a tablet.
Just found this -- to give some idea what guide data should be.
They were using Schedules Direct for $25/yr. The Channels thing
is a bit more maybe.
For a Canadian user of Media Center, it used to be, you went to
a certain private site, for some script or so, something to repair
what Microsoft had offered Canadians. Otherwise, Media Center could
not get digital TV working (analog might have worked but we don't
have any analog here, except in remote locations with five watt
transmitters and stuff). The Windows 7 on the other machine, may still
have the necessary materials.
https://www.thegreenbutton.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12700
It just always seems to be a "feeding off the land" kind
of experience, this TV recording thing.
I don't know why, but I just have this itch to buy enough
quads to record all the available channels, on a continuous basis :-)
And screw the Guide Data.
On Linux, you can use VLC to watch TV from a tuner. You
can use something like "w_scan" to do a channel scan and see
what your tuner can see. The tuner card needs "firmware", and
again, for my card, a private site run by some guy, has
extracted the firmware from the Windows driver, and you put
that in /fw or so, in the tree, so the boot process can find it.
Then the tuner magically works, when you wscan. That's how I got
the first images from my newest tuner card, as it took ten days
for my copy of WinTV to show up in the snail mail. But by then,
at least I knew the card worked, so the "need to return the product"
had passed.
And using the w_scan results, you have some idea what other recorder
packages should be seeing for channels.
Only a couple versions of Windows 7 don't have Media Center.
And you are unlikely to be using them (they're awful).
Paul
for right now I am going to hang on to TiVo as long as I can but I do
understand Xperi's desire to lose all the "lifetime" TiVo users.
It is like Social Security, they took the money up front and spent it
but they don't have a revenue stream big enough to support all the
lifetime obligations.

JJ
2024-08-08 09:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
There are quite a number of Android emulators for Windows, where BlueStacks
is the most popular one.

https://alternativeto.net/software/bluestacks/?platform=windows

For me which use Windows 7 64-bit running on Intel i5 3.2GHz Haswell using
only on-chip GPU (i.e. Intel HD) and 16GB RAM, BlueStacks never did work
well for me. Tried it twice. Your miles may vary.

Now I use Nox. Previously, I've used LDPlayer and MEmu. All of which use a
launcher with built-in app ads, unfortunately. Other emulators may have that
disadvantage too (including BlueStacks). But this can be worked around by
installing a different launcher app, more lightweight one, preferrably. The
MSI App Player is said to be BlueStacks without any app ads, but it never
work well for me either (probably because it's based on BlueStacks).

As for memory requirement, at least for Nox, the ideal minimum is 3GB of
free memory. So, a Windows 7 system with 4GB RAM is a bit stretching for it.
At least 8GB of RAM is recommended.

2-cores CPU would be a bit too heavy for such task; both for emulated
Android and the host system. At least 4-cores CPU is recommended.

Virtualization CPU feature is a must for this kind of emulation, since the
included Android OS is for x86/x86-64 CPU architecture. Without it,
emulation speed would slow down to near crawl (probably about 33% of optimal
speed).

Not sure if it's still apply for today's CPUs, but AFAIK Intel is better at
virtualization than AMD. Anyone can fill in?
Kerr-Mudd, John
2024-08-08 12:48:06 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:42:31 +0700
Post by JJ
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
There are quite a number of Android emulators for Windows, where BlueStacks
is the most popular one.
https://alternativeto.net/software/bluestacks/?platform=windows
For me which use Windows 7 64-bit running on Intel i5 3.2GHz Haswell using
only on-chip GPU (i.e. Intel HD) and 16GB RAM, BlueStacks never did work
well for me. Tried it twice. Your miles may vary.
Now I use Nox. Previously, I've used LDPlayer and MEmu. All of which use a
launcher with built-in app ads, unfortunately. Other emulators may have that
disadvantage too (including BlueStacks). But this can be worked around by
installing a different launcher app, more lightweight one, preferrably. The
MSI App Player is said to be BlueStacks without any app ads, but it never
work well for me either (probably because it's based on BlueStacks).
As for memory requirement, at least for Nox, the ideal minimum is 3GB of
free memory. So, a Windows 7 system with 4GB RAM is a bit stretching for it.
At least 8GB of RAM is recommended.
2-cores CPU would be a bit too heavy for such task; both for emulated
Android and the host system. At least 4-cores CPU is recommended.
Virtualization CPU feature is a must for this kind of emulation, since the
included Android OS is for x86/x86-64 CPU architecture. Without it,
emulation speed would slow down to near crawl (probably about 33% of optimal
speed).
Not sure if it's still apply for today's CPUs, but AFAIK Intel is better at
virtualization than AMD. Anyone can fill in?
There must've been older android developer tools under earlier OS's, but I
can't find a version running under XP. Probably I haven't looked hard
enough. Heck, I've even broken the XP USB driver for my older
smartphone.
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
JJ
2024-08-08 21:49:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:42:31 +0700
Post by JJ
Post by g***@aol.com
I am looking at "Channels" DVR software and the associated package but
it only serves "mobile" clients (Android. Apple etc)
My TVs all have W/7 machines on them. Is there a decent W/7 emulator
that would let me run an Android app?
There are quite a number of Android emulators for Windows, where BlueStacks
is the most popular one.
https://alternativeto.net/software/bluestacks/?platform=windows
For me which use Windows 7 64-bit running on Intel i5 3.2GHz Haswell using
only on-chip GPU (i.e. Intel HD) and 16GB RAM, BlueStacks never did work
well for me. Tried it twice. Your miles may vary.
Now I use Nox. Previously, I've used LDPlayer and MEmu. All of which use a
launcher with built-in app ads, unfortunately. Other emulators may have that
disadvantage too (including BlueStacks). But this can be worked around by
installing a different launcher app, more lightweight one, preferrably. The
MSI App Player is said to be BlueStacks without any app ads, but it never
work well for me either (probably because it's based on BlueStacks).
As for memory requirement, at least for Nox, the ideal minimum is 3GB of
free memory. So, a Windows 7 system with 4GB RAM is a bit stretching for it.
At least 8GB of RAM is recommended.
2-cores CPU would be a bit too heavy for such task; both for emulated
Android and the host system. At least 4-cores CPU is recommended.
Virtualization CPU feature is a must for this kind of emulation, since the
included Android OS is for x86/x86-64 CPU architecture. Without it,
emulation speed would slow down to near crawl (probably about 33% of optimal
speed).
Not sure if it's still apply for today's CPUs, but AFAIK Intel is better at
virtualization than AMD. Anyone can fill in?
There must've been older android developer tools under earlier OS's, but I
can't find a version running under XP. Probably I haven't looked hard
enough. Heck, I've even broken the XP USB driver for my older
smartphone.
Of all of Android emulators I've ever used other than the one which is part
of Adroid SDK, are based on VirtualBox. With specially configured guest VM.

The last version of VirtualBox which support Windows XP is the one before
v5.0. i.e. latest version of v4.xx.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VirtualBox#Host_support

Other emulator/virtualization applications which have a version that support
Windows XP such as VMWare, Virtual PC, Parallel, QEMU, Bochs, etc. may or
may not be able to run Android OS (x86 Android OS, of course). The hard part
is configuring the guest VM for Android. Some may not have the emulated
hardware(s) which are needed by Android OS.

The emulator for Windows which is part of Android SDK, uses Intel HAXM.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_Studio#System_requirements

AFAIK, Intel HAXM requires Intel CPU with hardware virtualization feature.
i.e. no software based emulation. FYI, Virtual PC, VMWare, Parallel, QEMU,
and VirtualBox support both hardware and software based emulation. IIRC,
don't know if it's still stand; Bochs is software based emulation only. QEMU
has support for emulating various CPUs including ARM.
Loading...