Discussion:
The Demonization of Whites by Mrs. Bill Gates and Other Dangerous Idiots
(too old to reply)
Anonymous
2018-06-15 05:39:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://www.amren.com/commentary/2018/06/the-demonization-of-whites-
by-mrs-bill-gates-and-other-dangerous-idiots/

Ilana Mercer, American Renaissance, June 9, 2018 She will invest in
start-ups with an eye to race and sex rather than ability.

Melinda Gates, a silly woman with an enormously wealthy husband, has
decided to reinvent herself as a venture capitalist. With a
difference.

With her husband’s billions, Mrs. Gates announced her intention to
venture into funding start-up companies that are likely to fail.

In an interview with Fortune Magazine, Gates “bashed ‘white guys,’”
and vowed to favor women and people of color in her investment
choices.

Using pigment and gender as criteria in allocating her abundant
resources is hardly a prudent investment strategy.

But Mrs. Gates can afford to lose money. Her husband is Bill Gates, a
lily-white billionaire (with lots of liver spots).
From the vertiginous heights of ignorance, Mrs. Bill Gates has scolded
the venture-capital industry:

“Enough with your love for ‘the white guy in a hoodie’” (whatever that
means).

Thanks to her husband’s vast riches, Melinda’s son, Rory John Gates,
will remain insulated from discrimination visited on white men, by
vindictive women like Mommy Dearest, in the name of “white privilege”
(whatever that means).

“White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on it”:
While the article is from 2015, Salon and other influential leftist
news sites have furnished sequels to the “salutary” warning, issued by
the magazine in time for Christmas.

“White men must be stopped”? What precisely does that mean?

In the postmodern tradition, the pseudo-academics behind the concept
of white privilege have invented for themselves an artificial,
political construct.

Political constructs confer power on those who dream them up. For
politics is the predatory process through which the figment of sick
minds is weaponized.

In defense of their world salads, our ideological overlords never
argue or prove their case. They simply assert it.

Clever catchphrases such as “white privilege” create political
reality, they don’t reflect it.

By banging on about systemic racism and the evils of whiteness, the
lunatics running the country’s academic and corporate asylums
indoctrinate the dumb and terrorize deviationists.

Here in the US, these sub-intelligent assault on the identity of
Europeans, Caucasians, melanin-deficient men—whatever you wish to call
the majority that founded America—is being institutionalized.

In South Africa, the writer’s birthplace, this impoverished,
linguistic onanism is already institutionalized. We know where that
has led.

Ominously, American universities, the University of Wisconsin-Madison
is an example, are offering courses framing “whiteness” as a
“problem.” “The Problem of Whiteness” in UW–Madison’s vernacular.

Notice how that’s phrased. A problem is something good people get rid
of, solve.

“The Problem of Whiteness.” “The Jewish Problem.” See where this might
lead?

Note the linguistic similarities between the language of white haters
and Jew killers.

The program known as “The Final Solution” was the Nazi’s solution to
what they termed “The Jewish Problem.”

Likewise, whites as whites are said to be a problem. Whites qua whites
are described as intrinsically bad.

Lightweight conservatives, the kind constantly empaneled on TV, cast
the assault on whites as “goofy,” to quote a Fox News guest. That’s
all. They make fun of it as no more than white noise, to be ignored.

The fate of the minority in South Africa suggests otherwise.

There is nothing remotely “goofy” about the demonization of whites. Of
any group, for that matter.

It so happens that whites are fair game. No other group would tolerate
being blackened.

Yes, profound stupidity is involved.

In an affirmative-action generated class of intellectuals who’re not
very intelligent, we have a monster of our own creation.

Certainly, by teaching and preaching collective guilt and guilt by
association, this Idiocracy is committing both logical and moral
errors.

Why so? Because you cannot blame a collective for your misfortunes
(real or imagined), unless each individual within that collective has
harmed you.

Alas, problems of atavistic anti-intellectualism, institutionalized
stupidity, and plain wickedness, culminating in institutionalized
anti-whiteness—these are never merely “goofy.”

They are dangerous.

Dehumanization is part of a broader process that leads to, and
legitimizes, violence—and worse.

“Dehumanization,” warns genocide expert Gregory Stanton, “overcomes
the normal human revulsion against murder.”

To give the reader a sense of how far into Dr. Stanton’s danger zone
American society has “advanced”: “Dehumanization is fourth in
Stanton’s “Ten Stages of Genocide.”

As for aider, abettor and all-round idiot Melinda Gates: She might
want to back the best and the brightest in her venture-capital
exploits. This way, Mrs. Bill Gates will have more money with which to
prop-up her failing, racially and sexually pure business ventures.
Anonymous
2018-06-17 09:26:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Mopre khazar centric bull shit, there never was and will be what you
have said.

Loading...